9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding eligibility for relief based on interest income received from co-operative societies. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of a cooperative milk producers' union for relief under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 concerning interest income received from other cooperative societies. The Income-tax Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had rejected the claim, stating that the interest income resulted in a loss, making the assessee ineligible for relief. However, the Tribunal, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Cloth Traders (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT, held that the deduction was admissible for the entire income received, not just the computed income after deductions under the Act. During the reference hearing, the Revenue's counsel cited Distributors (Baroda) P. Ltd. v. Union of India, where the Supreme Court disagreed with the Cloth Traders case's interpretation, favoring the decision in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT. The Supreme Court in Cambay Electric Supply Co. emphasized the three-step process for computing special deductions under section 80E, which also applies to section 80M. This interpretation was deemed applicable to section 80P as well, as per Sabarkantha Zilla Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd v. CIT. The assessee's counsel argued that the Tribunal had not properly considered the case facts, contending that the interest amount was not solely related to interest income but also included bank commission. They requested the Tribunal to determine the exact amount eligible under section 80P(2)(d) in line with the Cambay Electric Supply Co. judgment. The Court agreed with the assessee's submissions, directing the Tribunal to reevaluate the matter based on the principles outlined by the Supreme Court. Conclusively, the Court left the question unanswered and instructed the Tribunal to reconsider the issue in light of the facts and legal principles established by the Supreme Court, particularly referencing the Cambay Electric Supply Co. case. The reference was disposed of without any cost orders.
|
