Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (7) TMI 1110 - AT - Central Excise


Issues involved: Classification of heavy duty starter motors under Chapter Heading 8409.00 or 8511.00

Analysis:
1. Classification Dispute: The respondent-assessee, manufacturers of heavy duty starter motors, sought to classify the item under Chapter Heading 8409.00, but the department advised them to classify it under 8511.00 as an Electrical Item. The original authority held that the item is correctly classified under Chapter Heading 8511.00, leading to an appeal by the assessee.

2. Grounds of Appeal: The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal based on the following grounds: (i) The item manufactured is cranking motors, parts for I.C Engines, assembled from imported parts; (ii) The imported parts are described as Electrical component parts suitable for use with engines of specific headings; (iii) Customs classification cannot be reopened by Central Excise authorities.

3. Department's Argument: The department argued that even if components for starter motors are imported under Chapter 8409, when assembled, distinct goods emerge classifiable under a different heading, supporting the classification under 8511.00.

4. Legal Interpretation: The Tribunal considered the respondent's plea that there is no specific heading for Heavy Duty Cranking Motor under 8511.00. Referring to Section Note 2 (b) under Section XVI of the Tariff Act, the Tribunal concluded that parts suitable for use with specific machines should be classified under corresponding headings. As the Heavy Duty Cranking Motor is suitable for use with I.C. Engines of specific headings, it should be classified under sub-heading 8409.00, as argued by the assessee.

5. Decision: The Tribunal found merit in the respondent's argument and upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the appeal by the department was dismissed.

This detailed analysis highlights the classification dispute, grounds of appeal, legal interpretations, and the final decision regarding the classification of heavy duty starter motors under specific chapter headings, providing a comprehensive overview of the judgment issued by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates