9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Surtax liability as a revenue deduction. 2. Depreciation on research and development expenditure. 3. Allowability of interest charged under section 215 of the Income-tax Act. 4. Rent paid by the company for rent-free accommodation. Analysis: Issue 1: The Tribunal held that surtax liability for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78 is not a revenue deduction. The counsel agreed that this issue is covered by a previous decision in favor of the Revenue. Therefore, the court answered this question in favor of the Revenue. Issue 2: Regarding depreciation on research and development expenditure, the Tribunal ruled that the assessee is not entitled to depreciation due to a retrospective amendment of section 35, even though it was considered illegal. This issue was also decided in favor of the Revenue based on a Supreme Court decision, and hence, answered in favor of the Revenue. Issue 3: The main contention was the allowability of interest charged under section 215 of the Income-tax Act. The court considered previous decisions and held that such interest is not an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the Act. The court found no reason to reconsider the previous decision and answered this question in favor of the Revenue. Issue 4: The question of whether the rent paid by the company for rent-free accommodation is deductible under certain sections of the Act was not pressed by the counsel for the assessee. As a result, this question was not answered and returned unanswered. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue for all the issues except the one that was not pressed by the counsel. The judgment provided detailed reasoning based on previous decisions and established that certain deductions, such as interest under section 215, are not allowable under specific sections of the Income-tax Act.
|
