Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (6) TMI 591 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Waiver of pre-deposit of Cenvat credit demand upheld by Commissioner (Appeals).
2. Denial of Cenvat credit for welding electrodes, D.P. Liner, and processing chemicals.
3. Denial of capital goods credit for steel wire rod and other items.

Analysis:
1. The appellant sought a waiver of the requirement of pre-deposit of Cenvat credit demand of Rs. 3,86,288/- along with interest and penalty, upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 2,41,488/- for welding electrodes, D.P. Liner, and processing chemicals was denied, as well as the capital goods credit amounting to Rs. 1,44,800/- for steel wire rod and other items. The appellant argued that the items in question were essential for the manufacture of sugar, thus eligible for Cenvat credit. The Department defended the denial of credit.

2. The appellant contended that the welding electrodes were used for repair and maintenance of sugar mill machinery, citing a judgment by the Rajasthan High Court. They argued that D.P. Liner, Ranocide, Drimax, and Magna Flock were all integral to the sugar manufacturing process. The appellant asserted that these items qualified as inputs or capital goods under the relevant definitions. The Department, however, maintained its position that the Cenvat credit had been rightly denied and opposed the waiver of the pre-deposit requirement.

3. Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments. Referring to the Rajasthan High Court judgment, the Tribunal agreed that welding electrodes for repair and maintenance were eligible for Cenvat credit. It also acknowledged the essential role of D.P. Liner, Ranocide, Drimax, and Magna Flock in the sugar manufacturing process. Similarly, the Tribunal deemed the disputed capital goods, such as steel wire rope and boiler spares, as integral components for the production process. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was a prima facie strong case in favor of the appellant. Consequently, the pre-deposit of Cenvat credit demand, interest, and penalty were waived for the appeal hearing, with recovery stayed until the appeal's disposal or a period of six months from the order's issuance, whichever came earlier. The stay petition was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates