9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding rectification of mistakes in an Income tax Officer's order granting relief under section 91. Analysis: The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the Tribunal referred a question to the High Court regarding the rectification of a mistake in an Income tax Officer's order granting relief under section 91. The assessee, a banking company, had devaluation profits of Rs. 28,56,666 arising in its Kuala Lumpur and Penang branches. The Income-tax Officer initially granted relief under section 91 on a sum of Rs. 14,98,034, but later invoked section 154 to rectify the mistake, as the devaluation profit had not been taxed in Malaysia. The Tribunal held the issue to be debatable and outside the purview of section 154. Upon review, the High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's view that the issue was debatable. It was established that the devaluation profit of Rs. 28,56,666 had not been taxed in Malaysia, leading to double taxation in India only on the balance sum of Rs. 9,24,484. As per the provisions of section 91, double taxation relief can only be allowed for income doubly taxed in both countries. Therefore, the Income-tax Officer correctly invoked section 154 to rectify the mistake in granting relief based on the incorrect amount of Rs. 14,98,034. The High Court answered the question in the negative, in favor of the Revenue. The judgment highlights the importance of correctly applying the provisions of double taxation relief under section 91 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It clarifies that relief can only be granted for income that has been doubly taxed in both India and the foreign jurisdiction. The case emphasizes the significance of accurate assessment and rectification of mistakes to prevent double taxation and ensure fair treatment of income.
|
