Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (4) TMI 312 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Classification of P.V.C. Floats under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Analysis:
The case involved the classification of P.V.C. Floats manufactured by M/s Garware Marine Industries Ltd. under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Joint Commissioner alleged that the assessee misclassified the product under chapter subheading no. 3926.90 instead of 8907.00, resulting in non-payment of special excise duty. The Additional Commissioner confirmed the show cause notice and imposed a penalty. However, the Commissioner(Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal based on the following grounds:

(i) The P.V.C. Float, being a small item made of P.V.C. used to support fishing nets, does not qualify as a floating structure under Chapter 89.
(ii) Chapter 89 pertains to vehicles, aircraft, vessels, and associated transport equipment, which the P.V.C. Float does not fall under.
(iii) The extended period could not be invoked as there was no suppression of facts, and the product had been classified under Chapter 39.26 since 1994.

The Revenue appealed the decision, arguing that the P.V.C. Float should be classified under Chapter 89.07 as a floating structure. The Revenue contended that the product serves a specific purpose and should not be classified under Chapter 39.26. However, the Tribunal disagreed with the Revenue's argument, citing that Chapter 89.07 covers floating structures like buoys and beacons, which the P.V.C. Float did not resemble. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner(Appeals) that the P.V.C. Float did not qualify as a floating structure under Chapter 89.07.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeal and rejected it. The judgment upheld the classification of the P.V.C. Floats under Chapter 39.26 and dismissed the Revenue's claim that it should be classified under Chapter 89.07.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates