9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Exemption under section 5(1)(xviii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. 2. Inclusion of Rs. 37,000 in the net wealth of the petitioner. 3. Valuation of 3,851 fruit-bearing trees. 4. Valuation of land based on relevant considerations. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Exemption under Section 5(1)(xviii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 The court examined whether the land measuring 542 kanals 19 marlas, received by the petitioner's ancestors for an act of gallantry, was exempt under section 5(1)(xviii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court held that the exemption under this section applies only to property received directly by the assessee from the Government in pursuance of any gallantry or merit award approved by the Central Government. Since the land was inherited and not directly received by the petitioner, and there was no evidence that the award was approved by the Central Government, the exemption was not applicable. Issue 2: Inclusion of Rs. 37,000 in the Net Wealth of the Petitioner The court addressed whether the amount of Rs. 37,000 related to Daryapur land should be included in the net wealth of the petitioner. It was established that the right to receive compensation is an asset and its value must be considered in computing the net wealth. The court referred to past decisions and a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes, concluding that the face value of the compensation should be discounted appropriately due to deferred payment. Thus, the amount of Rs. 37,000 should be included in the net wealth but discounted for deferred payment. Issue 3: Valuation of 3,851 Fruit-bearing Trees The court evaluated whether the value of 3,851 fruit-bearing trees should be considered as fuel wood or as fruit-bearing trees. Given that the land was under acquisition proceedings for urbanization, the court agreed with the Appellate Tribunal that the trees should be valued as fuel wood. The context of pending acquisition for urbanization justified this valuation approach. Issue 4: Valuation of Land Based on Relevant Considerations The court examined the valuation of urban and suburban land in the revenue estate of Gumtala, Amritsar. The Wealth-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had valued the land at Rs. 9 per square yard based on various factors including proximity to developed areas and other sales. However, the Appellate Tribunal considered the award dated October 3, 1973, by the Amritsar Improvement Trust, which valued the land at Rs. 5 and Rs. 4 per square yard for urban and suburban land respectively, as more relevant. The Tribunal's reliance on this award was deemed appropriate as it related to the very land in question and reflected the value closest to the valuation date. The court found that the Tribunal's factors had greater persuasive value and were more cogent compared to those relied upon by the Wealth-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Thus, the Tribunal's valuation was upheld. Conclusion: The court decided: 1. The petitioner was not entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(xviii) of the Wealth-tax Act. 2. The amount of Rs. 37,000 should be included in the net wealth but discounted for deferred payment. 3. The trees should be valued as fuel wood. 4. The valuation of land by the Appellate Tribunal at Rs. 5 and Rs. 4 per square yard was justified and based on relevant considerations.
|
