9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment addresses whether income from purchase and sale of agricultural lands, constituting a business, is taxable as income from agriculture and if a specific case law applies. Details of the Judgment: First Issue - Income Classification: The Tribunal held that profits from the sale of agricultural land are revenue within the meaning of the Income-tax Act, exempt from tax u/s 10(1). The Tribunal based its decision on the fact that the land in question was agricultural and thus the profits derived were exempt under section 2(1)(a) of the Act. Second Issue - Capital Gains: The judgment refers to a decision by the Bombay High Court stating that capital gains from the sale of agricultural land are considered revenue derived from such land, falling under agricultural income u/s 2(1). The court highlighted that certain amendments made post the relevant assessment year did not impact the applicability of this decision. Third Issue - Business Activity: The Revenue contended that the land was not purchased for agricultural operations but for business purposes. However, the Tribunal rejected this argument due to lack of evidence supporting the Revenue's claim. As there was no proof of the land being part of the business assets of the assessee, the income from its transfer was not considered as business income. In conclusion, the judgment ruled that the income in question could not be taxed under the Income-tax Act either as business income or capital gains. The two questions referred by the Tribunal were answered in the affirmative, against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.
|
