9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Challenge to notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 1973-74. Detailed Analysis: The High Court of Gujarat heard petitions challenging a notice issued by the Income-tax Officer under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioners contended that the notice was illegal and lacked jurisdiction as they had disclosed all relevant facts during the assessment proceedings for the year 1973-74. The petitions involved two related cases concerning the assessment year 1973-74, where the petitioners had submitted their returns along with the statement of total income and accounts for a construction project. The Income-tax Officer had passed an order under section 143(3) of the Act, acknowledging the income sources and the construction details provided by the petitioners. In a previous assessment year, a similar issue had arisen regarding the construction of a building, which was resolved in favor of the assessee. The impugned notice under section 148 for the assessment year 1973-74 was challenged on the grounds of jurisdiction and legality. The court granted interim relief to maintain the status quo during the proceedings. The petitioners argued that the notice was invalid as it did not establish that they had failed to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, as required by law. The court referred to established legal principles regarding the reopening of assessments under section 147 of the Act. It emphasized the importance of the assessee's duty to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment and highlighted the need for the assessing authority to draw inferences based on the disclosed facts. The court cited relevant judgments to support the requirement of full and true disclosure by the assessee for a valid reassessment under section 148. Based on the facts presented and the legal precedents cited, the court concluded that the petitioners had disclosed the primary facts regarding the construction project at Nargole during the assessment proceedings. The Income-tax Officer should have verified the accuracy of the information provided by the petitioners at that time. Therefore, the court allowed the petitions, quashed the notice issued under section 148, and restrained the respondent from taking further action based on the said notice. The court made the rule absolute in favor of the petitioners with no order as to costs.
|
