Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + SC VAT and Sales Tax - 2010 (2) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (2) TMI 937 - SC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Department was right in issuing show-cause notices to delete High Speed Diesel (HSD) from the recognition certificates under Section 4B of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948.
2. The nature of the power exercised by the assessing authority under Section 4B(4)(ii) of the 1948 Act.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Issuance of Show-Cause Notices to Delete HSD
The respondents are manufacturers of notified goods and have been given Central registration under Section 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and recognition certificates under Section 4B of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, to purchase high-speed diesel oil (HSD) at a concessional rate. The lead matter is the case of Vam Organic Chemicals Limited, which uses HSD to operate diesel generating sets (D.G. sets) for generating electricity used in the manufacturing process of chemicals.

The Department issued a circular on June 20, 2000, based on a decision taken on June 12, 2000, stating that the benefit of form IIIB for the purchase of HSD used in D.G. sets should not be given as it is not directly used in the manufacture of notified goods but for generating electricity. Consequently, show-cause notices were issued to delete HSD from the recognition certificates. The High Court ruled that the Department's stand was highly technical and that HSD was used for manufacturing chemicals as per Section 4B(2) of the 1948 Act. The High Court set aside the show-cause notices and circulars, stating that HSD constitutes a fuel required for manufacturing chemicals.

Issue 2: Power of Assessing Authority under Section 4B(4)(ii)
The Supreme Court examined the nature of the power exercised by the assessing authority under Section 4B(4)(ii) of the 1948 Act. The section grants the assessing authority the discretionary power to amend a recognition certificate for any sufficient reason, provided reasonable opportunity of being heard is given to the dealer. The Department argued that HSD was included in the recognition certificates by mistake and sought to rectify this by deleting HSD.

The Supreme Court noted that the Department's action to amend the recognition certificate by deleting HSD should be viewed as an amendment rather than rectification. The Court emphasized that the benefit of concessional tax rates, once granted, could not be withdrawn retrospectively but only from the date of issuance of the show-cause notice.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court remitted all cases to the assessing authority, directing them to treat the show-cause notices as proposals to amend the existing recognition certificates. Each assessee will be given a hearing, and cases will be decided on their own merits, uninfluenced by the High-Power Committee's decision or the circulars issued. The assessing authority must provide reasoned orders, and any amendment to the recognition certificate will operate only from the date of the show-cause notice.

The batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh was disposed of with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates