Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1992 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1992 (7) TMI 63 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The judgment addresses the question of law regarding the validity of charging interest under section 217 in a reassessment made under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Summary:
The High Court of Rajasthan considered a case where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal questioned the validity of charging interest under section 217 in a reassessment made under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a Hindu undivided family, was initially assessed in 1968, and later, additional income was brought to tax in a reassessment in 1975. The Income-tax Officer sought to revise the interest charged under section 154, leading to a dispute.

The court analyzed the definitions of assessment and regular assessment under the Income-tax Act. It was argued that interest under section 217 is automatic and should be charged for the first assessment under section 147. However, the court noted that the specific language of the Act restricts the meaning of fresh assessment to sections 143 or 144, excluding reassessments under section 147.

Referring to precedent and case law, the court highlighted that interest under section 217 cannot be levied in reassessments under section 147, as seen in various judgments from different High Courts. The court emphasized that interest is payable only up to the date of regular assessment under sections 143 or 144, not in reassessments under section 147.

Ultimately, the court upheld the view of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that interest cannot be charged under section 217 in a reassessment made under section 147. The judgment favored the assessee, concluding that the Tribunal's decision was in accordance with the law.

In conclusion, the court answered the reference in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates