Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2012 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (10) TMI 122 - AT - Income TaxAddition on account of unexplained investment u/s 69 On basis of bank statement Assessee replied that some money is received on account of retirement - Loan from friends & relatives - AO stated that no. of person withdrawn money from assessee s bank account - Assessee made frequent deposits/withdrawals in the bank to show a rosy picture for obtaining visa Held that - AO failed to examine these person as to why the amount was withdrawn by them. Since,Therefore issue has not been examined properly. Decision case remand back to AO. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80C Whether deduction under sec. 80C is claimed for renovation of house Held that - As the provisions of sec.80C are not applicable in respect of amount spent on renovation. Appeal decide in favour of revenue
Issues:
1. Addition of Rs.12,84,027/- as income from undisclosed sources challenged. 2. Addition of Rs.29,964/- u/s 80C towards house renovation challenged. Analysis: 1. The first issue involves the addition of Rs.12,84,027/- as income from undisclosed sources. The appellant, a retired SDO, declared income of Rs.1,10,422/- as pension. The Assessing Officer questioned deposits of Rs.28,01,661/- in bank accounts and asked for the source. The appellant claimed it was from retirement benefits, loans, and gifts. However, the AO rejected this, citing lack of evidence and inconsistencies in statements. The CIT(A) deleted Rs.1,13,500/- of the addition, but ITAT remanded the case for further examination of cash withdrawals and deposits for visa purposes. 2. The second issue concerns the addition of Rs.29,964/- u/s 80C for house renovation. The appellant claimed this amount as a deduction, but both the AO and CIT(A) disallowed it. The ITAT upheld the disallowance, stating that sec.80C does not allow deductions for renovation expenses. Therefore, the disallowance was deemed appropriate under the law. In conclusion, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the undisclosed income issue for further assessment while upholding the disallowance of renovation expenses under sec. 80C.
|