1990 (11) TMI 44 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding weighted deduction for export promotion expenses.

Analysis:
The judgment involves a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1977-78. The main question referred to the High Court was whether the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, even if the assessee is not the direct exporter of goods. The case revolved around a contract where the assessee-company supplied distribution materials to another party, which was then exported by a different entity. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that since the exporting entity was different, the deduction was not applicable to the assessee. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the claim based on a Tribunal's decision in a similar case.

During the appeal to the Tribunal, the department contended that the assessee was not the exporter and therefore not entitled to the deduction. The Tribunal referred to the provisions of section 35B and previous decisions to determine that it is not necessary for the assessee to be the direct exporter to claim the deduction. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Income-tax Officer for further enquiry to establish fulfillment of conditions under section 35B(1)(b).

The High Court analyzed the provisions of section 35B, which allow for weighted deduction for export promotion expenses incurred directly or indirectly by the assessee. The Court referred to Circular No. 27 dated August 16, 1969, which clarified that expenditure incurred indirectly by export houses on behalf of constituents may qualify for weighted deduction. The Court emphasized that the key requirement for the deduction is that the expenditure must be incurred to promote sales outside India of goods dealt in by the assessee.

The Court held that the assessee, as the manufacturer of the goods exported through another entity, was entitled to claim the weighted deduction under section 35B. It was established that the goods were sold on a "High Seas Sales" basis, making the assessee the real exporter despite the involvement of another entity in the export process. Therefore, the Court concluded that the assessee fulfilled the requirements of section 35B and was entitled to claim the deduction, rejecting the argument that direct export was necessary for eligibility.

In conclusion, the High Court answered the reference question in favor of the assessee, affirming their entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B.