Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1991 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (2) TMI 83 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Deductibility of interest towards sales tax arrears in the assessment year.
2. Accrual of interest on unpaid tax under the U. P. Sales Tax Act.
3. Relevance of accrual date for claiming deduction on mercantile basis accounting.
4. Impact of court orders on the accrual date of liabilities.

Analysis:
1. The High Court was tasked with determining the deductibility of an amount claimed by the assessee for interest paid towards sales tax arrears in the assessment year 1972-73. The Tribunal disallowed the deduction, leading to the appeal. The assessee paid Rs. 32,992 towards interest in the relevant accounting year and sought to deduct it, which was rejected by the Income-tax Officer but allowed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). However, the Tribunal overturned this decision, holding the amount not deductible in the concerned assessment year.

2. The judgment highlighted that interest on unpaid tax accrues under the statutory provisions of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, as established in the case law of Haji Lal Mohammad Biri Works v. State of U. P. It was emphasized that the accrual of interest does not necessitate an assessment order or a notice of demand, and it continues to accumulate irrespective of stay orders or other legal interventions.

3. The court delved into the significance of the accrual date for liabilities in mercantile basis accounting. It clarified that the mere payment of interest in compliance with a court order does not alter the accrual date of the liability. Referring to the decision in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. CIT, the court emphasized that the date of accrual, not the payment date, is crucial for determining deductibility.

4. Additionally, the judgment addressed the impact of court orders on the accrual date of liabilities, emphasizing that such orders do not shift the date of accrual for accounting purposes. The court distinguished the case at hand from precedents like Addl. CIT v. Rattan Chand Kapoor, highlighting the relevance of accounting methods in determining the timing of liability accrual.

In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, affirming that the interest amount paid towards sales tax arrears was not deductible in the assessment year 1972-73, emphasizing the importance of the accrual date and accounting principles in determining the deductibility of such expenses.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates