Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

Income Tax Bill, 2025 TaxTMI TMI - e-Newsletter TaxTMI Finance Ministry Revises AIDC Rates: Bourbon... TaxTMI Private Companies Get Extended Deadline Until June... TaxTMI Partnership Firm Wins Appeal Delay Condonation... TaxTMI Tax Department Must Share Documents Requested by... TaxTMI Input Tax Credit Denied: Taxpayers Failed to Prove... TaxTMI Input Tax Credit Utilization From Different GST... TaxTMI DGFT Makes Electronic Certificates of Origin... TaxTMI Central Government Sets Phased Implementation Dates... TaxTMI RBI Revises Payment Rules Between ACU Member... TaxTMI Stock Exchanges Must Take Full Responsibility for... TaxTMI SEBI Makes Intermediaries Fully Liable for AI... TaxTMI New Income Tax Bill Proposes Single Tax Year... TaxTMI Assessment Order Under Section 73 of GST Act... TaxTMI Revenue Appeals Below Rs. 2 Crores Must Be... TaxTMI Legal Heirs Must Pay Compensation in Cheque Bounce... TaxTMI Latest Case-Laws TaxTMI Latest Notifications + Circulars TaxTMI GST Council Decisions TaxTMI

Home

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1988 (11) TMI HC This

Login
Referred In
Summary

Forgot password New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

1988 (11) TMI 22 - HC - Income Tax

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana decided in favor of the Revenue in a tax case. Various questions were raised, with some answered in favor of the Revenue and others against. The court disposed of the matter with no order as to costs.

← Previous Next →

Quick Updates:

What's New:
Latest Case Laws

What's New:
Latest Notifications

What's New:
Latest Circulars

F: Participant Questions Legality of Single SCN for Two Years Under Secti...

F: Business Challenges ITC Reversal Due to Supplier's GST Non-Payment, Ci...

F: GST Registration Required for Reverse Charge on Goods Transport Servic...

F: Debate on GST's Applicability to Stamp Duty: Exemption Under SI. No 47...

H: GST Council Clarifies Rates: 5% on Pepper, Tax-Free Raisins, Different...

H: Exim Bank's $120M Credit Line to GO-VNM for High-Speed Guard Boats und...

H: Export-Import Bank's $180M Credit Line for Offshore Patrol Vessels Mus...

H: Gold Bullion Import Quota: New Rules for TRQ Allocation Require Certif...

H: DGFT Sets Import Quotas: 0.8 MT Calcined 1.9 MT Raw Petroleum Coke for...

H: Government Securities Trading Rules Modified Under Section 16 to Contr...

H: Finance Ministry Revises AIDC Rates: Bourbon Whiskey at 50%, Other Alc...

H: Private Companies Get Extended Deadline Until June 30, 2025 For Securi...

A: Section 10AA: Tax Exemptions for Companies in SEZs Boost Export Income...

A: Supreme Court orders insurance company to settle truck fire claim, val...

A: Court Quashes Penalty for Wrong Tax Head Credit Allocation; Electronic...

A: Uttar Pradesh Launches E-HRMS Portal for State Employees: Streamlined ...

A: Retrospective GST Cancellations Risk Halting Business Operations; Cour...

A: Filing Complaints on Misleading Food Labels: Understanding the Process...

A: Telangana High Court Validates Extension of Limitation Period for Show...

A: Global Shift to Ban Harmful Food Additives: Health, Safety, and Enviro...

A: E-commerce operators must pay GST liabilities via cash ledger under Se...

A: Indian Customs Cuts Port Dwell Time with Direct Port Delivery, Faceles...

F: Debate on Time-Barred Appeals Post FORM GST APL-02 Issuance Under Sect...

H: Small Retailer Gets Final Chance to Restore GST Registration by Filing...

H: GST Refund Claim Rejection Invalid: Authority Must Give Reasoned Order...

H: Tax Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalid When No Material Facts Were...

H: Tax Authorities Must Re-examine Trading Results and Form 26AS Discrepa...

H: Taxpayer's Section 10(26AAA) Sikkimese Exemption Claim Remanded for Fr...

H: Property Transaction Additions Under Section 69A Deleted Due to Bankin...

H: Assessment Order Under Section 56(1)(vii) For Rs. 139.67 Crores Quashe...

↑Top