9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (12) TMI 900 - AT - Income TaxValidity of assessment u/s 263 - Held that - The subscription collected by the assessee is not its income and hence is not taxable in the hands of the assessee - The assessee is only a nodal agency for collecting subscription on behalf of M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd. - The amounts collected by the assessee are credited to the separate account Subscription Charges - The said account is debited at the end of Financial Year when the amounts are paid to M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd. - As the subscription collected by the assessee from various cable operators is not the income of the assessee, the same is not shown in Profit & Loss account - The cable operators are deducting tax at source on the payments of subscription made to assessee - The assessee is remitting the gross amount to M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd., the assessee is entitled to receive credit of the tax deducted at source u/s. 199 of the Act subject to production of TDS Certificates received from respective deductors - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
- Assessment order challenged under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - Allegations of erroneous assessment and prejudicial interest to Revenue. - Non-inclusion of certain amounts in Profit & Loss Account. - Application of TDS provisions and Section 40(a)(ia). - Discrepancy between TDS certificates and Profit & Loss Account. Detailed Analysis: Assessment Order Challenge: The appeal was filed against the Commissioner of Income Tax's order dated 16-03-2011 under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in billing and collection services for a network, faced scrutiny resulting in the acceptance of the income declared. However, the Commissioner deemed the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest, leading to the issuance of a notice under section 263. Non-Inclusion in Profit & Loss Account: The Commissioner raised concerns regarding the non-routing of a substantial amount to the network without reflecting it in the Profit & Loss Account. Additionally, the charging of service tax on subscription receipts and the application of TDS provisions, specifically Section 40(a)(ia), were questioned. The discrepancy between TDS certificates and the Profit & Loss Account was highlighted, emphasizing the need for proper accounting treatment. Application of TDS Provisions: The Tribunal analyzed the case, noting that the assessee remitted the gross amount received from cable operators to the network, including TDS deductions. The subscription collected was not considered as the assessee's income but as the network's, subject to taxation in their hands. The Tribunal clarified the role of the assessee as a collection agent, entitled to credit for TDS deductions under section 199 upon providing TDS Certificates. Double Taxation Concerns: The Tribunal emphasized that taxing the commission received by the assessee would result in double taxation since the subscription amount collected was not the assessee's income. The Tribunal's decision to allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order was based on the understanding that the main issue resolved eliminated the need to address consequential issues, given the unique circumstances of the case. In conclusion, the Tribunal's detailed analysis focused on clarifying the nature of the income, the application of TDS provisions, and the potential for double taxation concerns, ultimately leading to the allowance of the appeal and the setting aside of the Commissioner's order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
|
