9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding weighted deduction for expenses incurred in India for promotion of exports. Analysis: The case involved a dispute over whether expenses incurred in India for a conference aimed at promoting exports qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed a deduction for expenses related to a conference held in Calcutta for export promotion. The Income-tax Officer initially rejected the claim, considering the conference a routine program. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner also denied the deduction, stating that since the expenses were entirely incurred in India, no deduction was permissible under section 35B. However, the Tribunal, following precedent, held that weighted deduction could be claimed even for expenses incurred in India if they were for the purpose of export promotion. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to determine if the expenses were indeed incurred for export promotion. The interpretation of section 35B was crucial in this case. The Tribunal relied on the provision that expenditure must be incurred wholly and exclusively on activities mentioned in sub-clauses (i) to (viii) for obtaining weighted deduction. The residual clause, sub-clause (ix), allowed for deduction for activities prescribed for promoting sales outside India. The Tribunal emphasized that the activities listed in sub-clauses (i) to (viii) were also considered as activities for export promotion, even though the specific term "promotion of sale outside India" was not used. Various activities like advertisement outside India, obtaining market information abroad, and foreign travel for export promotion were considered under this provision. The Court rejected the argument that sub-clause (ix) was not applicable in the absence of prescribed rules for certain activities, emphasizing that the Tribunal's focus was on determining if the expenses were incurred for export promotion. The Court clarified that the Tribunal's directive to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was to assess if the expenses fell within the activities listed in sub-clauses (i) to (viii) of section 35B. Therefore, the Court answered the referred question in favor of the assessee, indicating that the expenses could qualify for weighted deduction if they were for export promotion. The judgment highlighted the broad scope of activities considered as promoting sales outside India under section 35B, emphasizing that the focus was on the purpose of the expenditure rather than the location of its incurrence.
|
