Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (4) TMI 534 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Admissibility of Cenvat credit on LDO and HSD.
2. Eligibility of Cenvat credit on input services used in the manufacture of towers.

Analysis:
Issue 1: Admissibility of Cenvat credit on LDO and HSD
The appeal (E/764/10) pertains to the availment of Cenvat credit on LDO/HSD and its eligibility during the period from April 2004 to March 2005. The Commissioner (Appeals) had considered the issue of admissibility of Cenvat credit on LDO and HSD, concluding that these items are specifically excluded from the definition of inputs under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The rules unequivocally exclude LDO and HSD from the definition of inputs, as clarified through notifications and amendments. The appellant contended that LDO and HSD should be considered inputs based on their usage in generating electricity. However, the Tribunal rejected this argument, emphasizing that items excluded from the definition of inputs cannot be brought back in through usage criteria. Therefore, the appeal was rejected, affirming that duty paid on LDO and HSD is not eligible for credit post the amendment on March 1, 2003.

Issue 2: Eligibility of Cenvat credit on input services
The second appeal (E/765/10) concerns the eligibility of Cenvat credit on input services utilized in the manufacture of towers. The appellant had not made any submissions apart from stating the usage of LDO and HSD as fuel for electricity generation. As there were no additional arguments presented, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order. However, due to ambiguity regarding the appellant's intention to appear for a personal hearing or make submissions for this appeal, the Tribunal decided to consider appeal E/765/10 separately and grant the appellants another opportunity for a personal hearing. Consequently, only appeal E/764/10 was taken up for final decision, while E/765/10 was deferred for further proceedings.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the exclusion of LDO and HSD from the definition of inputs for Cenvat credit purposes, emphasizing that even if these items are used in manufacturing, they do not qualify for credit. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to statutory definitions and rules in determining the admissibility of Cenvat credit, thereby providing clarity on the scope of eligible items for credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates