Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (12) TMI 940 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Classification of Ring Rim under Chapter 40 of Central Excise Tariff. Eligibility of Ring Rim for Cenvat credit as capital goods or input.

Analysis:
The appellant, a manufacturer of tyres and tubes, uses a process involving testing of tyres, specifically an inflated dimensions test, which necessitates the use of an item called Ring Rim for mounting the tyre on a standard rim and inflating it with air to measure dimensions. The Department contended that Ring Rim is not eligible for Cenvat credit, leading to a show cause notice for credit denial amounting to Rs. 2,85,150. The Asstt. Commissioner upheld this denial, confirmed the credit demand, and imposed penalties. This decision was affirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals).

During the hearing for a stay application, the appellant's counsel argued that Ring Rim is essential for tyre testing, a crucial part of the manufacturing process, even if not classified as capital goods, it should qualify as an 'input' under the broad definition covering items used directly or indirectly in manufacturing finished products. The counsel cited a judgment of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court to support this argument. On the other hand, the Departmental Representative opposed the stay application, reiterating the previous findings that Ring Rim does not fall under the definitions of capital goods or input, justifying the denial of Cenvat credit.

After considering both sides' submissions and reviewing the records, the judge found that Ring Rim, a rubber item under Chapter 40 of the Central Excise Tariff, is indeed essential for tyre testing before clearance. The judge opined that Ring Rim is necessary for the manufacturing process as untested tyres cannot be marketed. Interpreting the definition of 'input' broadly, the judge concluded that Ring Rim qualifies as an item used in or in relation to the manufacture of rubber tyres, directly impacting the final product. Citing the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court's judgment, the judge emphasized that the definition of 'input' encompasses items commercially expedient for use, not solely based on what ought to be used. Consequently, the judge ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for Cenvat credit demand, interest, and penalty, and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal.

In summary, the judgment revolved around the classification of Ring Rim under the Central Excise Tariff and its eligibility for Cenvat credit as either capital goods or input. The decision favored the appellant, emphasizing the essential nature of Ring Rim in the manufacturing process and its direct relevance to the final product, leading to the allowance of the stay application and waiver of pre-deposit requirements.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates