Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2014 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (4) TMI 837 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Denial of CENVAT credit on outdoor catering service; Plea for waiver and stay of recovery

Denial of CENVAT credit on outdoor catering service:
The judgment revolves around the denial of CENVAT credit of Rs.16,58,941/- to the appellant for 'outdoor catering service' used in providing food in the factory canteen to workers during the material period. The appellant contended that the canteen facility was provided as mandated by Section 46 of the Factories Act, as they had over 250 workers during that time. The cost of services was included in the production cost of final products without recovery from employees. The appellant cited precedents Commissioner Vs Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. and Commissioner Vs Ultratech Cement Ltd. where CENVAT credit was allowed on similar grounds. The learned Superintendent (AR) opposed the stay application, arguing insufficient pleading of necessary facts in the appeal.

Plea for waiver and stay of recovery:
The Tribunal, after considering the submissions, found that all significant facts were pleaded before the adjudicating authority and reiterated during the proceedings. The mandatory requirement of maintaining a canteen under Section 46 of the Factories Act was specifically mentioned in the grounds of appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal granted waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery of adjudged dues as requested by the appellant. The judgment highlights the importance of presenting necessary facts and legal provisions in appeals for favorable outcomes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates