9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Income tax assessment regarding the write-off of time-barred claims in the revenue account.
Analysis: The case involved the assessment of an insurance company for the assessment year 1967-68, concerning the write-off of time-barred claims in its revenue account. The company, after adjusting Rs. 50,000 to its revenue account for the year 1960 in its Rangoon branch, wrote off the balance of Rs. 46,703 due to uncertainty of remittance from Rangoon to India. The Income-tax Officer initially disallowed the write-off as a loss, considering it a loss of capital. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the decision, emphasizing that the amount could not be written off as it was credited in the company's account and the business in Burma was still operational. However, the Tribunal accepted the company's contentions, stating that the amount was not taxable profit and directed the deletion of Rs. 46,703 from the total income. Regarding the legal aspects, the Tribunal's decision was challenged through a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The question of law referred to the High Court was whether the sum of Rs. 46,703 was chargeable to tax under rule 5 of the First Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, and section 41(1) of the said Act. During the hearing, it was acknowledged that the amount in question did not constitute income for the company, as it was adjusted through a contra entry for accounting purposes and had not reached the company as income. The method of accounting was also undisputed by the Revenue. Ultimately, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating that there was no reason to interfere with the findings. The Court affirmed that the amount of Rs. 46,703 was not chargeable to tax, as it did not qualify as taxable profit. The reference was disposed of in favor of the assessee, and no costs were awarded. Additionally, it was noted that the Ruby General Insurance Company had merged with the National Insurance Company of India, and the records were to be corrected accordingly. Judge Monjula Bose concurred with the judgment.
|
