Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2014 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (9) TMI 855 - AT - Service Tax


Issues involved:
1. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings sought by the petitioner.
2. Classification of supply of water as a taxable service prior to 1-7-2010.
3. Confirmation of amount for renting of immovable property and its classification.
4. Tax liability arising from goods transport agency service received by the petitioner.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought waiver of pre-deposit and stay of proceedings following an adjudication order by C.C.E. & S.T., Hyderabad-II Commissionerate. The Revenue asserted a demand of &8377; 3,05,83,495, comprising amounts related to the sale of water, renting of immovable property, and goods transport agency service. The petitioner was required to supply water to vessels at the Kakinada Deep Water Port under an agreement with M/s. Kakinada Seaports Ltd. Revenue considered this as a taxable port service. The classification of port services was amended by the Finance Act, 2010, effective from 1-7-2010, impacting the taxation of services provided within the port.

2. The supply of water by the petitioner was deemed a taxable service by Revenue, but the classification exercise was missing in the show cause notice and the adjudication order. The Tribunal found that the identification of the appropriate taxable service for supply of water before 1-7-2010 was not clearly done, indicating a lack of sustainable conclusion.

3. An amount for renting of immovable property was confirmed in the adjudication order. The Revenue alleged that the petitioner received a sum for developing storage infrastructure at the port. However, the Tribunal found the classification as renting of immovable property to be prima facie mis-conceived, as the nature of activities did not align with the criteria for such classification under the Act.

4. The tax liability of &8377; 24,905 arising from goods transport agency service received by the petitioner was confirmed. The petitioner's defense that no Service Tax was recovered from the service provider was rejected. The Tribunal found no merit in this contention, upholding the liability of the petitioner to remit the Service Tax.

In conclusion, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit on certain conditions and stayed the recovery pending disposal of the appeal. The detailed analysis of each issue highlighted discrepancies in the classification of services and tax liabilities, leading to a nuanced evaluation of the petitioner's claims and the Revenue's assertions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates