Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1987 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1987 (10) TMI 25 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Entitlement to registration under section 185
2. Continuation of registration after partner's death
3. Condonation of delay in making registration application
4. Assessment for the entire previous year

Entitlement to Registration under Section 185:
The case involved a firm that had undergone changes in its constitution over the years. The firm filed a return for the assessment year 1975-76 but faced issues regarding registration under section 185. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the firm was not entitled to registration under section 185, considering the specific circumstances and changes in the firm's composition.

Continuation of Registration after Partner's Death:
Following the death of a partner, the firm executed a new partnership deed with the remaining partners and a new partner. The court affirmed the decision that the firm was dissolved upon the partner's death and that continuation of registration under section 184(7) was not applicable. The court concluded that there was a change in the firm's constitution, leading to the necessity of a new registration application.

Condonation of Delay in Making Registration Application:
The firm sought condonation of delay in filing the registration application due to misplaced documents. The court rejected the explanation provided by the firm, citing discrepancies in statements from involved parties. The court held that the delay could not be condoned based on the facts presented, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with registration requirements.

Assessment for the Entire Previous Year:
The Tribunal's decision that only one assessment was required for the entire previous year was upheld by the court. The court found no error in the Tribunal's approach, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment covering the entire previous year. The court provided detailed opinions on each issue raised and aligned with the decisions made by the Tribunal based on the specific legal provisions and factual circumstances presented in the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates