2015 (1) TMI 273 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Waiver of pre-deposit - Whether Tribunal was justified in directing the assessee to deposit 20% of the disputed amount payable under Delhi Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act and 10% of the disputed penalty as a pre-condition for hearing of the appeals on merits Held that - The disputed amounts pertain to the Financial Years 1997-98 to 1999-2000 - the proceedings have remained pending for over a decade and the assessee cannot be blamed and was not responsible for the same - the appellant is not in a position to pay the amounts because of the change in circumstances and their weak financial position/condition - in the cases filed by Calcom Electronics Ltd., the appellant relies upon ST-35 forms of ₹ 6,21,91,904/- from their sister concern Calcom Vision Ltd., the other appellant - the question of pre-deposit had earlier become the subject matter of an order passed by the Tribunal in the case of Calcom Electronics Ltd. for the FY 1997-98, 1998-99 and in the case of Calcom Vision Ltd. for the FY 1997-98 - The said deposits as directed were made - The financial position of the appellant company, rather weak and any harsh condition would put them in difficulty as the appeals would not be heard and decided on merits but dismissed on the ground of non-payment of pre-deposit thus, the order of the Tribunal is modified as Calcom Electronics Ltd. is directed to deposit a consolidated amount of ₹ 10 lacs, which will be deposited in two instalments - Partial stay granted.

Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in filing and refiling appeals.
2. Substantial questions of law regarding pre-deposit conditions for hearing appeals.
3. Disposal of appeals with consent of parties.
4. Financial Year-wise details of tax demands and pre-deposit requirements.
5. Disputed amounts related to sales tax statutory forms.
6. Verification and consideration of filed forms by authorities.
7. Appellant's weak financial position and inability to pay demanded amounts.
8. Errors in the Appellate Tribunal's assessment of form filings.
9. Modification of pre-deposit directions by the High Court.

Analysis:
1. The High Court addressed applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling appeals due to delays of 47 days and 15 days, respectively. The court noted the appellant's prior review applications before the Appellate Tribunal under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, ultimately allowing the applications.
2. The High Court framed substantial questions of law regarding pre-deposit conditions for hearing appeals. The court examined the appeals by Calcom Electronics Ltd. and Calcom Vision Ltd., focusing on the justification of directing the appellants to deposit percentages of disputed amounts and penalties as pre-conditions for hearing on merits.
3. With the consent of the parties, the High Court disposed of the appeals concerning similar issues and questions raised by the parties through a common order.
4. The judgment detailed the tax demands and pre-deposit requirements for each financial year (1997-98 to 1999-00) concerning the appeals filed by Calcom Electronics Ltd. and Calcom Vision Ltd., highlighting the history of assessments, pre-deposit amounts, and subsequent appeal outcomes.
5. The court emphasized the disputed amounts' association with sales tax statutory forms, the filing of forms by the appellants, and the authorities' verification and consideration of these forms, including discrepancies in record maintenance and traceability of filed forms.
6. Considering the appellant's weak financial position and the prolonged pendency of proceedings, the High Court acknowledged the challenges faced by the appellants in meeting the demanded amounts, primarily due to sales tax statutory forms and related issues.
7. The judgment pointed out errors in the Appellate Tribunal's assessment of form filings, noting discrepancies in the Tribunal's observations regarding the timing and verification of form submissions by the appellants.
8. Ultimately, the High Court modified the Appellate Tribunal's pre-deposit directions, specifying consolidated amounts to be deposited by Calcom Electronics Ltd. and Calcom Vision Ltd. in instalments, along with additional requirements such as filing undertakings and submitting photocopies of forms for examination by the revenue authorities.
9. The High Court's modifications aimed to address the appellants' financial constraints while ensuring compliance with pre-deposit conditions, providing specific timelines and instructions for the appellants to follow, ultimately partially allowing and disposing of the appeals based on the revised directions.

← Previous Next →