9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of deductions u/s 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for interest paid on arrears of purchase tax, entitlement to deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) for interest on purchase tax loan, and treatment of excess amount collected pending a legal dispute as a trading receipt or business expenditure.
Interpretation of deductions for interest paid on arrears of purchase tax: The court relied on precedents Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. v. CIT [1980] 123 ITR 429 (SC) and Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. v. CIT [1983] 144 ITR 732 (All) [FB] to allow deduction of interest paid to the Government on arrears of purchase tax for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 u/s 256(1) and section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. Treatment of excess amount collected during legal dispute: The assessee collected Rs. 8,76,277 pending a legal dispute, which was later required to be refunded. The court held that this amount did not constitute a trading receipt, as the assessee was obligated to repay it to constituents, thus allowing it to be excluded from total income as business expenditure under the mercantile system of accounting. Judicial precedent and application of mercantile accounting system: The court cited a previous case where collections made were not considered trading receipts due to the obligation to refund, even without a statutory provision. The obligation to repay the excess amount in this case entitled the assessee to claim it as business expenditure, offsetting the trading receipt. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to exclude the amount from total income for the assessment year 1974-75. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues, allowing deductions for interest paid on purchase tax and excluding the excess amount collected from total income.
|
