Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2015 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 270 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
Appeal against imposition of redemption fine and penalties in importation of vessels for breaking purpose.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad addressed a common issue involving the contestation of redemption fine and penalties imposed on the importation of vessels for breaking purpose. The Tribunal considered the appeals collectively for disposal after hearing both sides and examining the records. The Tribunal referred to a previous case involving a similar issue where the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. In that case, the Tribunal set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed. The Tribunal highlighted the classification of surplus fuel stored in vessels brought for breaking up under CTH 8908, along with the main vessel. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clarifications issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) regarding the classification of items under the Import Trade Control (ITC) policy. It was noted that such clarifications are binding on Customs concerning ITC restrictions under the Foreign Trade Policy. However, the classification under the Customs Tariff Act falls within the Customs Authorities' jurisdiction. The judgment underscored that vessels brought in for breaking up, along with surplus fuel, should be classified under Heading 89.08 of the Import policy. As imports under this classification are free without restrictions, the Tribunal concluded that the fuel contained in vessels for breaking up cannot be confiscated under the Customs Act, and no penalties can be imposed on the appellants. The judgment allowed the appeals filed by the appellants with consequential relief, and the early hearing applications were disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates