Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 2268 - AT - Central Excise


Issues Involved:
Classification of base frames for pumps under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Whether classifiable under 8413.90 or 8485.90.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of base frames used for mounting pumps. The Revenue contended that the base frames should be classified under 8485.90, while the appellant argued for classification under 8413.90. The appellant claimed that the base frames were specifically designed for each model of pump and were essential for efficient functioning, thus falling under 8413.90. They provided evidence such as purchase orders, invoices, and a Chartered Engineer's certificate to support their claim.

The appellant's counsel highlighted that the base frames were not interchangeable between different pump models, emphasizing their specific design for each pump set. They argued that since the base frames were integral to the functioning of the pumps, they should be classified under 8413.90. The counsel also pointed out that selling pumps without base frames to some customers did not diminish the importance of the base frames as essential accessories.

On the other hand, the Revenue argued that the base frames were not integral parts of the pumps but rather accessories that could be sold separately. They referred to the HSN explanatory notes under 8485, which specifically mentioned base plates as falling under that classification. The Revenue contended that since the base frames were similar to base plates, they should be classified under 8485.90 as parts of machinery not specified elsewhere.

After considering the submissions from both sides, the Tribunal examined the purchase orders and invoices provided by the appellant. They noted that the base frames were sold separately from the pumps, indicating that they were accessories rather than integral parts. The Tribunal referred to the relevant headings and explanatory notes under 8413 and 8485 to determine the correct classification.

The Tribunal concluded that since the base frames were designed to be parts of machinery in general and not specific to any particular machine, they should be classified under 8485.90. Despite being designed for specific pump models, the base frames were considered accessories and not integral parts of the pumps. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the classification of the base frames under 8485.90, in line with the Revenue's contention.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates