9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 regarding deduction of loan taken from Life Insurance Corporation of India on insurance policies. Analysis: The case involved a reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred a question of law regarding the deduction of a loan taken from the Life Insurance Corporation of India on insurance policies. The assessee, a Hindu undivided family, claimed a deduction of Rs. 1,69,950 as a debt owed, but the Wealth-tax Officer disallowed it, leading to this reference. The primary issue was whether the loan amount was an allowable deduction under section 2(m)(ii) of the Act. The assessee argued that the loan amount was a debt owed in relation to his net wealth and should be allowed as a deduction. On the other hand, the Revenue contended that the loan was related to exempted wealth and not eligible for deduction under section 2(m)(ii) of the Act. The Revenue relied on various High Court rulings to support its position, emphasizing that loans on insurance policies not yet matured were not deductible. The court analyzed the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, particularly section 2(m) which defines "net wealth" and section 5 which deals with exemptions from wealth tax. It concluded that an insurance policy, until matured and payable, is not considered an asset in the net wealth of an assessee. Therefore, any loan taken on such a policy cannot be claimed as a deductible debt owed under the Act, as per the clear mandate of section 2(m)(ii). Additionally, the court discussed the amendments made to section 2(m) by the Wealth-tax (Amendment) Act, 1964, and rejected the argument that these changes affected the scheme of the Act or the determination of net wealth. The court aligned its decision with previous High Court judgments from Allahabad, Madras, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh, which held a consistent view that loans on immature insurance policies were not deductible. Ultimately, the court answered the question in the negative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. The decision was based on the understanding that loans on insurance policies not yet matured were not allowable deductions under the Wealth-tax Act. The parties were directed to bear their own costs in the circumstances of the case.
|
