Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2016 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (1) TMI 274 - AT - CustomsDenial of SAD exemption on the imported LPG through high sea sales - Held that - Appellants have imported LPG through high sea sales transactions under the Bill of Entry No. 322 dated 17.06.1998 and there is no dispute on the sale of LPG to various customers and also discharged sales tax. On identical issue the Tribunal in the case of CC, Mangalore Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.(2006 (2) TMI 480 - CESTAT, BANGALORE), held that SAD is not leviable - Tribunal has relied on the decision of VigiromChem (P) Ltd.(2005 (8) TMI 532 - CESTAT, BANGALORE). The case on hand is identical to the above and hence by applying the above decision we hold that the demand of SAD on the imported goods is not sustainable. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues: Denial of Special Additional Customs Duty (SAD) exemption on imported LPG purchased through high sea sales.
Analysis: The appeal was filed against the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals), which related to the demand of Rs. 3,23,338/- as special additional customs duty not paid by the appellants due to goods being purchased through high sea sales. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand under Section 28(1), and on appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order, leading to the present appeal. The appellant argued that despite purchasing the goods through high sea sales, they paid sales tax as the LPG was subsequently sold to various customers. They claimed eligibility for SAD exemption under Notification No. 34/98, which exempts SAD on goods imported for sale. The appellant cited relevant case laws to support their argument. On the contrary, the Revenue contended that the exemption from SAD was not available as the goods were purchased through high sea sales, and the LPG had to be refilled in cylinders before being sold to customers. After hearing both sides, the main issue was identified as the denial of SAD exemption on the imported LPG. The Tribunal referred to a previous case where it was held that SAD is not leviable when imported goods are sold as such and bear the burden of sales tax. The Tribunal found that in the current case, the situation was similar to the precedent, and therefore, the demand for SAD on the imported goods was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
|