9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Assessment of wealth-tax for the years 1977-78 to 1980-81 based on the Hindu joint family status post the Kerala Act 30 of 1975. Analysis: The petitioner, an assessee to wealth-tax, claimed that the joint family got statutorily disrupted post the Hindu joint Family (Abolition) Act, 1975. The Income Tax Officer accepted this plea and assessed income only up to November 30, 1976, for the year 1977-78. Subsequently, the Revenue initiated proceedings for the years 1977-78 to 1980-81 under the W.T. Act, which were challenged by the petitioner as void and illegal (Exts. P-2 to P-5). The Appellate Tribunal annulled the assessment for the year 1977-78, stating that there was no assessable entity in the status of a HUF on March 31, 1977. As the assessment for 1977-78 was already nullified, the validity of Ext. P2 notice was not considered. The focus shifted to Exts. P3, P4, and P5 notices for the subsequent years. The court held that if there was no assessable entity as a HUF for 1977-78, it was baseless to assume the existence of a HUF for the following years. Thus, Exts. P3, P4, and P5 were deemed invalid and lacking jurisdiction, leading to their quashing. The Revenue argued that the Kerala Act 30 of 1975 only brought about a division in status, not a partition as required by the W.T. Act or I.T. Act. However, the court disagreed, citing a Division Bench decision that the Act resulted in the statutory extinction of joint families, not just a disruption by partition. The provisions of the Act clearly ended joint Hindu families in Kerala, eliminating the possibility of assessing an HUF post-December 1, 1976. The court rejected the Revenue's contention and allowed the O.P., quashing Exts. P3, P4, and P5. As the assessment for 1977-78 was already annulled, no further relief was necessary regarding Ext. P2. In conclusion, the judgment emphasizes the statutory abolition of joint Hindu families in Kerala post the Act 30 of 1975, rendering the assessment of HUF status for wealth-tax purposes invalid for the years 1977-78 to 1980-81. The court's decision to quash the notices for these years was based on the clear legal implications of the statutory enactment and the absence of a valid assessable entity as a HUF.
|
