9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of charitable purpose under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for exemption of income from tax under section 11. Analysis: The High Court of Kerala was presented with a question regarding the exemption of income from tax under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1971-72. The case involved the Sree Narayana Trust, Quilon, which received income exceeding expenditure during the relevant year. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the claim for exemption under section 11, citing that certain clauses of the trust deed did not disclose a charitable purpose. However, both the Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the clauses in question were not inconsistent with a charitable purpose. The trust deed outlined various objects of the trust, including the maintenance and development of educational institutions, establishment of technological institutions, and other institutions for the welfare and advancement of the people. The key contention revolved around the interpretation of the term "charitable purpose" as defined in section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, which includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility. The court referred to a Supreme Court decision which clarified that as long as the primary purpose of the trust or institution is related to relief of the poor, education, or medical relief, carrying out activities for profit would not disqualify it from being considered charitable. The High Court analyzed the clauses of the trust deed and concluded that they did not deviate from the definition of charitable purpose under the Act. The clauses were found to be aligned with educational activities and the promotion of the welfare of backward people, which are central to charitable purposes. The court specifically addressed the contention raised by the Revenue regarding the terms "physical" and "material" in certain clauses of the trust deed, emphasizing that these terms were connected to educational activities and did not detract from the charitable nature of the trust's objectives. Ultimately, the court upheld the decisions of the AAC and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The court directed each party to bear their respective costs in the tax-referred case and ordered the judgment to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.
|
