9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether sales tax refund and sums realized for payment to Indian Sugar Syndicate Ltd. are trading receipts of the assessee. Summary of Judgment: The High Court of PATNA considered whether sales tax refund and sums collected for the Indian Sugar Syndicate Ltd. were trading receipts of the assessee. The assessee, a sugar factory, had collected sales tax from dealers and deposited it in the Government treasury u/s 14A and 20A of the Bihar Sales Tax Act. Subsequently, the Supreme Court declared these sections ultra vires, leading to the refund of the tax collected. The assessee had to refund this amount to dealers, and a portion remained with the assessee. Similarly, the amount collected for the Indian Sugar Syndicate remained under dispute. The Tribunal initially ruled in favor of the assessee, considering these amounts as liabilities. However, the Department disagreed and sought a reference to the High Court. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Chowringhee Sales Bureau (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, emphasizing that amounts realized as sales tax must be treated as trading receipts. The Court also cited other cases supporting this view. Despite the assessee's arguments based on other judgments, the Court held that both the sales tax refund and the amount collected for the Indian Sugar Syndicate should be considered trading receipts of the assessee. The Court answered both questions in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Department, settling the matter based on established legal principles. Therefore, the High Court concluded that the sales tax refund and the sum collected for the Indian Sugar Syndicate were indeed trading receipts of the assessee, aligning with the Supreme Court's precedents and other relevant legal decisions. The judgment was delivered by UDAY SINHA J., with agreement from NAZIR AHMAD J.
|
