Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2007 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (5) TMI 160 - AT - Central ExciseSSI Exemption Applying higher rate of duty merely because of erronous mention of higher rate in CT-3 As per Rule 173N, in event of failure to produce warehousing certificate, the duty leviable on consignment is to be paid Exemption of Not. 9/2000 (concession rate of duty) is allowed
Issues:
1. Benefit of exemption under notification No. 9/2000 2. Applicability of duty rate on consignments cleared under CT-3 certificate Analysis: 1. The dispute revolved around the appellant's claim for exemption under notification No. 9/2000. The Tribunal had earlier directed the lower authority to redetermine the duty liability considering this exemption. The adjudicating authority did not allow the exemption, citing various reasons. The appellant argued that they were entitled to the exemption based on statutory records showing benefit given in other clearances. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, stating that the lower authority erred in not allowing the exemption. The duty demand was confirmed to a reduced amount, and the rest of the demand, penalty, and interest were set aside. 2. Another issue was the duty rate applied to consignments cleared under CT-3 certificate. The appellant contended that the higher duty rate mentioned in the certificate was erroneous, and Rule 173N mandated payment of duty leviable for the consignment. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's argument, noting that the duty payable was based on the failure to produce the warehousing certificate. The appellant was required to pay duty at the concessional/exempted rate only on the consignments cleared against CT-3. The total duty payable was determined, and the Tribunal confirmed a specific amount while setting aside the rest of the duty demand, penalty, and interest. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, confirming a reduced duty demand while setting aside other components of the demand. The judgment clarified the entitlement to exemption under notification No. 9/2000 and the correct application of duty rates on consignments cleared under CT-3 certificate, providing a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and factual circumstances involved in the case.
|