Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2010 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (10) TMI 1191 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment include sustaining trading addition in declared results, rejecting regular books of accounts, applying Gross Profit Rate, charging interest u/s 234B and 234C, jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, and levy of costs.

Issue 1 - Trading Addition and Rejection of Books of Accounts:
The appeals involved sustaining trading addition and rejecting regular books of accounts. The Assessing Officer rejected the books of account due to the non-maintenance of a day-to-day stock book, leading to the adoption of a gross profit ratio of 14.34% and an addition of Rs. 6,98,606 to the total income. The contention was that the transfer of stock between the assessee's proprietary concerns did not amount to a sale, affecting the gross profit ratio. The Tribunal held that the transfer did not constitute a sale and that deficiencies in maintaining books of account were not sufficient grounds for rejection. The addition made by the CIT (A) was deemed unjustified.

Issue 2 - Interest Charged u/s 234B and 234C:
The contention was that the interest charged under sections 234B and 234C was invalid and unjustified. The Tribunal deemed this issue consequential and directed the Assessing Officer to revise the interest amount in line with the order.

Issue 3 - Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer:
The appellant's contention regarding the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction was not accepted by the CIT (A). However, this issue was not pressed further by the appellant's counsel during the proceedings.

Issue 4 - Levy of Costs:
The appellant prayed for suitable costs, but this issue was not pressed by the appellant's counsel during the proceedings.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partially allowed ITA NO. 93 / JU / 2010 and allowed ITA NO.94 / JU / 2010. The judgment was pronounced on 8-10-2010, with the order in one case being made applicable to the other due to identical facts and grounds.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates