9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of the amount of Rs. 98,000 received by the assessee. 2. Classification of the amount as salary, compensation, or revenue receipt. 3. Determination of the assessment year for the taxable amount. Summary: 1. Taxability of the amount of Rs. 98,000 received by the assessee: The primary issue was whether the entire amount of Rs. 98,000 accrued to the assessee on December 18, 1958, the date on which the suit was compromised, and was taxable in the assessment year 1959-60. The Tribunal concluded that the sum of Rs. 98,000 constituted an income receipt and addressed the alternative argument that the entire sum was not taxable in the assessment year under appeal. The Tribunal directed the ITO to determine the number of plots sold by the assessee, the price for which they were sold, and the remuneration accrued to the assessee in respect of such sales to include the remuneration relatable to the plots sold during the previous year only in the assessment for the year under appeal. 2. Classification of the amount as salary, compensation, or revenue receipt: The ITO initially held that the balance of Rs. 98,000 was liable to tax either as salary or as compensation. The AAC concluded that the amount received by the assessee was towards his remuneration and was received in the course of carrying on his professional activity. The Tribunal, however, determined that the remuneration received by the assessee could not be taxed under the head "Salary" by virtue of clause (1) of Explanation II to s. 7 of the 1922 Act because the assessee could not be described as an employee of the company. The Tribunal also concluded that s. 10(5A)(c) had no application in the present case. The Tribunal held that the compensation was paid as surrogatum for profits likely to arise to the assessee if the contract had run its normal course, thus classifying it as a revenue receipt liable to tax. 3. Determination of the assessment year for the taxable amount: The Tribunal addressed the alternative argument that the entire sum of Rs. 98,000 was not taxable in the assessment year under appeal. It was argued that the compensation was paid partly in respect of the sales already effected and partly in respect of the loss of future profit. The Tribunal restored the case to the ITO with a direction to determine the number of plots actually sold by the assessee, the price for which they were sold, and the remuneration accrued to the assessee in respect of such sales to determine the period when such remuneration accrued. The Tribunal directed that whatever amount out of Rs. 98,000 is not relatable to the plots actually sold shall be included as income of the year under appeal. Conclusion: The reference was answered against the Department and in favour of the assessee, with no order as to costs. The Tribunal's directions were upheld, emphasizing the need to determine the specific assessment year for the taxable amount based on the sales and remuneration details.
|
