Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2018 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (12) TMI 1732 - AAR - GST


Issues involved:
- Interpretation of tax rate for a specific contract under CGST and APGST Acts
- Determination of whether the contract qualifies for a concessional GST rate
- Evaluation of the nature of the contract and the entities involved

Analysis:
1. Tax Rate Interpretation:
The applicant sought an advance ruling on the tax rate applicability for a specific contract under Notification No. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and No. 24/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The issue revolved around whether the works contract services provided to a specific entity fell under the category of services provided to a government or a government authority. The applicant referenced GO MS no. 58 dated 8th May 2018, highlighting the applicable GST rates under the APGST/CGST Act. The jurisdictional officer confirmed no pending proceedings related to the applicant.

2. Nature of Contract and Entities Involved:
The Authority examined the nature of the contract undertaken by the applicant, focusing on the services provided to the Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited. The discussion delved into the definition of a "Government Entity" under Notification No. 31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and concluded that the contractee was a Government Company wholly owned by the Government of Andhra Pradesh. This determination influenced the tax rate applicability.

3. Works Contract Classification:
The Authority analyzed the nature of the work undertaken by the applicant, emphasizing the execution of works awarded by the Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited. The contract was deemed a single composite contract with two connected agreements. The discussion highlighted the definition of a "works contract" under the CGST Act and APGST Act, emphasizing the treatment of composite supply of works contract as a supply of service. The ruling clarified that the contract entered by the applicant fell under the works contract category, subject to an applicable tax rate of 18%.

In conclusion, the Authority ruled that the applicant was not entitled to the concessional GST rate of 12% and that the applicable tax rate for the services referred to in the application was 18%. The detailed analysis of the contract nature, entities involved, and relevant notifications under the CGST and APGST Acts formed the basis of the ruling provided by the Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates