Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1962 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1962 (8) TMI 116 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
Whether the trustees could be treated as a dealer in shares for the assessment year 1955-56?

Detailed Analysis:
The case involved a reference under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act to determine if the trustees could be considered as dealers in shares for the assessment year 1955-56. The trustees, appointed under a will, were initially prohibited from selling properties but later given the power to sell and invest in shares. The trustees sold some shares in the previous year, resulting in a surplus. The Income-tax Officer treated the entire surplus as taxable income, considering the trustees as dealers in shares. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner categorized the surplus from shares sold within three years as income from dealing and the rest as capital gain. The Tribunal, however, viewed the entire surplus as capital gain, not taxable income, stating the trustees acted in the best interests of the trust. The Commissioner appealed this decision, leading to the High Court reference.

The High Court analyzed the facts and circumstances of the case to determine if the trustees' actions constituted dealing in shares or making investments. The trustees were directed to invest in specified areas and had the power to vary investments for the trust's benefit. The court noted that the mere frequency of transactions, such as selling shares within three years, does not automatically indicate dealing in shares. The court also considered the beneficiary's involvement in share dealings and whether the trustees' actions were influenced by profit motives. However, the court found these circumstances inconclusive and insufficient to conclude that the trustees intended to deal in shares. The Tribunal's decision was upheld as it was based on factual findings and did not involve any legal errors.

In conclusion, the High Court answered the reference question in the negative, stating that the Tribunal's decision was based on valid conclusions from the case's facts. The court held that the trustees' actions were in the best interests of the trust and did not amount to dealing in shares. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision that the surplus was capital gain and not taxable income for the assessment year 1955-56.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates