9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of arrears of rent. 2. Inclusion of arrears of rent in total wealth under the cash system of accounting. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Taxability of Arrears of Rent: The primary issue was whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding the taxability of arrears of rent. The Tribunal's decision was based on the fact that the arrears of rent had not become irrecoverable or bad debts, despite the assessee's claim that they were doubtful of realization. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had been able to recover some of the arrears each year, and thus, these arrears were not considered bad debts. The Tribunal also considered the ongoing litigation for the recovery of arrears and concluded that the entire amount could not be treated as the wealth of the assessee. Instead, it estimated the market value of such assets at 60% for each year, providing partial relief to the assessee. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating that the arrears of rent and mesne profits had fructified into a decree passed by a competent court. The decree, passed on December 1, 1967, entitled the assessee to mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 600 per month from December 5, 1965. The court emphasized that the arrears were a known amount by the relevant valuation dates and thus should be included in the assessee's assets. The court also referenced the Supreme Court's definition of "property" as a term of the widest import, signifying every possible interest a person can acquire, hold, and enjoy. Consequently, the court concluded that the arrears of rent were liable to be included in the assets of the assessee. 2. Inclusion of Arrears of Rent in Total Wealth Under Cash System of Accounting: The second issue was whether the arrears of rent could legally be included in the total wealth on the basis of accrual when the assessee follows the cash system of accounting. The court examined Section 7 of the Wealth-tax Act, which provides the mode to determine the value of assets. Sub-section (1) refers to the value of "any assets other than cash," and ordinarily, the value of any asset other than cash may be determined at the market value on the valuation date. The court noted that the assessee maintained its accounts on a cash basis but had not produced any balance-sheet. The court distinguished between the determination of the net value of business assets and other assets, stating that the rental income earned by the assessee from property was taxable under the head "Property" and not "Business." The court also referenced the Orissa High Court's decision in Vysyaraju's case, which held that accrued income not received should still be taken into account for wealth-tax purposes. However, the court found this decision distinguishable, as it involved the determination of the net value of a business asset, whereas the present case did not. The court agreed with the Calcutta High Court's view in Dipti Kumar Basu v. CWT, which held that the Wealth-tax Act is concerned with the net wealth of the assessee, irrespective of the system of accounting. The court concluded that the arrears of rent could be included in the net wealth of the assessee since it is an asset, and the system of accounting maintained by the assessee is not relevant for this purpose. Conclusion: The court answered both questions in favor of the Department and against the assessee. The taxability of arrears of rent was upheld, and the arrears of rent were included in the total wealth of the assessee, irrespective of the cash system of accounting. The Commissioner of Wealth-tax was entitled to costs assessed at Rs. 250.
|
