9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the issue of anticipatory bail granted by the High Court under Section 438 of the CrPC and the correct procedure to be followed when such bail is granted. Summary: The petitioner filed an application in the High Court for anticipatory bail under Section 436 of the CrPC and obtained an ad-interim anticipatory bail order with conditions, including reporting to the Police Station daily. The High Court directed the petitioner to move a regular bail application before the Court handling the criminal case against him on the final disposal date. The Supreme Court noted that anticipatory bail is granted when there is a belief of potential arrest for a non-bailable offense, but it does not bypass the regular court where the trial will take place. The Court emphasized that anticipatory bail orders should have a limited duration, and upon expiry, the regular court should assess the evidence before deciding on bail. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision as the correct procedure was followed. The petitioner was given two weeks to apply for bail before the regular Court if desired, as an interim order had extended the duration of the bail order.
|
