1980 (10) TMI 8 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Liability to tax on income below Rs. 5,000 in assessment years 1971-72 to 1973-74.
2. Taxability of trust income at the rate of 65% under section 16 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. Validity of the supplementary deed of declaration dated March 14, 1971.
4. Determination of shares of beneficiaries under the trust.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The case involved a private family discretionary trust assessed for the years 1971-72 to 1973-74 with income below Rs. 5,000. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) elected to tax the income at a rate of 65% under section 164 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, post an amendment by the Finance Act, 1970. The court held that the income, despite being below the threshold, was liable to tax under the provisions of section 164(1) of the Act, disregarding the Finance Acts of 1971, 1972, and 1973.

Issue 2:
The question arose regarding the taxability of trust income at the rate of 65% under section 16 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the assessment made by the ITO, stating that the shares of the beneficiaries were indeterminate and unknown as per the original trust deed and the supplementary deed was ineffective in making the shares determinate. Therefore, the tax was correctly charged at the specified rate.

Issue 3:
The validity of the supplementary deed of declaration dated March 14, 1971, was challenged. The court found that the trustees had no authority to vary the terms of the original trust deed, as the beneficiaries were initially intended to be all the issues of a specific individual. The supplementary deed, which attempted to restrict the beneficiaries to two specific individuals, was deemed ineffective.

Issue 4:
The determination of the shares of the beneficiaries under the trust was a crucial aspect of the case. The court held that the original deed of trust made the beneficiaries' shares indeterminate and unknown. Despite arguments to the contrary, the court found that the number of beneficiaries and their shares were not clearly defined, leading to the application of section 164(1) of the Act and the tax assessment at a rate of 65%.

In conclusion, the court answered the questions posed as follows:
- Issue 1: The income was liable to tax despite being below Rs. 5,000.
- Issues 2, 3, and 4: The taxability at 65%, validity of the supplementary deed, and determination of beneficiaries' shares were all decided against the assessee.