Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2018 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (4) TMI 1876 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Granting of interim order for restoration of DIN numbers of the Directors.
2. Disqualification of Companies and the remedy available to the petitioners.
3. Consideration of the petitioners' intention to close the company and follow the procedure established by law.

Analysis:
1. The petitioners requested an interim order to restore their DIN numbers to submit annual returns and financial statements of their company. The counsel for the petitioners argued that the facts of this case were similar to other cases where interim orders were granted. The main contention was the need for a stay of proceedings to follow the Condonation of Delay Scheme. The Assistant Solicitor General opposed the interim order, suggesting that the petitioners should approach the Tribunal for remedies under Section 252 of the Act. The Court considered the submissions and decided that restoring the DIN numbers was essential for the petitioners to fulfill their directorial duties and proceed with closing the company following legal procedures.

2. The Court acknowledged the necessity of restoring the DIN numbers for the petitioners to discharge their functions as Directors in other companies as well. It was noted that the petitioners intended to close their company by following the established legal procedure, which was deemed to serve the interests of justice. Consequently, the Court ordered a stay of proceedings to disable the DIN of the petitioners and directed the 1st respondent to restore their DIN numbers to enable compliance with the COD Scheme. The petitioners were instructed to deposit charges and submit necessary documents before the Registrar of Companies by the extended deadline of 30.04.2018.

3. The Court scheduled the next hearing after four weeks for further proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of restoring the DIN numbers for the petitioners to carry out their directorial responsibilities and avail the benefits of the COD Scheme. The decision highlighted the significance of following legal procedures for closure and the need for compliance with regulatory requirements within the specified timeline.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates