Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2019 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (5) TMI 1904 - HC - Money Laundering


Issues: Application for early listing; Summons by non-bailable warrants; Bail bonds submission; Stay application disposal

In this judgment, the main issue before the court was the application for early listing of a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed by the petitioners. The petitioners were aggrieved by an order passed by the Special Sessions Judge, Jaipur, where their application under Section 70(2) of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed, and they were summoned by non-bailable warrants at the first instance. The petitioners argued that in a complaint case, they should have been summoned by bailable warrants instead. The matter was scheduled for the petitioners' presence the following day.

The counsel for the petitioners relied on a Supreme Court case, "Inder Mohan Goswami & Ors. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors.," emphasizing that liberty is a fundamental human right, and courts should exercise caution before issuing non-bailable warrants. The Supreme Court had noted that non-bailable warrants should only be issued when summons or bailable warrants are unlikely to produce the desired result.

The respondent's counsel opposed the petition, requesting that the petitioners be allowed to appear before the lower court the next day and submit bail bonds as deemed appropriate by that court. Given the petitioner's willingness to comply with the court's requirements, the High Court allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. The petitioners were granted permission to appear before the concerned court the next day and submit bail bonds as directed by that court. Consequently, the stay application was disposed of by the court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates