Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (9) TMI 1283 - AT - Income Tax
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of additions in the return of income.
2. Taxability of agricultural land as a capital asset.
3. Taxability of notional capital gains based on an unexecuted Joint Development Agreement (JDA).
4. Assessment of capital gains in the hands of the society versus individual members.
5. Applicability of the concept of mutuality in the formation of the society.
6. Applicability of amended provisions of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act read with section 2(47) of the IT Act.
7. Legality of charging interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C.
8. Assessment year for capital gains.
9. Rebate u/s 54F.
10. Validity of proceedings u/s 148.
Summary:
1. Validity of Additions in the Return of Income:
The assessee contested that the addition made in the return of income was against the acts and law of the case. The ITAT upheld the additions, referencing prior decisions in similar cases, indicating that the issues were covered by the decisions of the Chandigarh ITAT and Amritsar ITAT in the cases of Charanjit Singh Atwal and Satnam Singh Kainth.
2. Taxability of Agricultural Land as a Capital Asset:
The assessee argued that the demised land being agricultural land and not an asset within the ambit of section 2(14)(iii), no capital gain was attracted on its alleged transfer. The ITAT rejected this argument, stating that the land in question was indeed a capital asset as per the prevailing legal interpretations and prior judgments.
3. Taxability of Notional Capital Gains Based on an Unexecuted JDA:
The assessee contended that the AO misdirected in law and facts by taxing notional capital gains based on an unexecuted JDA. The ITAT held that the JDA, though unexecuted, had resulted in the transfer of rights as defined u/s 2(47) of the IT Act, thereby attracting capital gains tax. The ITAT referenced detailed analyses and precedents, including the case of Charanjit Singh Atwal, to support its decision.
4. Assessment of Capital Gains in the Hands of the Society versus Individual Members:
The assessee argued that the capital gains, if any, should be assessed in the hands of the society and not the individual members. The ITAT dismissed this argument, noting that the society acted as a facilitator and the individual members were the actual owners of the plots who received the consideration directly.
5. Applicability of the Concept of Mutuality:
The assessee claimed that the concept of mutuality involved in the formation of the society rendered the transaction non-taxable. The ITAT rejected this claim, stating that the mutuality concept did not apply to the transactions in question, which were clearly taxable under the IT Act.
6. Applicability of Amended Provisions of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act Read with Section 2(47) of the IT Act:
The assessee argued that no capital gain was liable to tax beyond the part of the land actually transferred by way of registered sale deed. The ITAT held that the amended provisions of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act read with section 2(47) of the IT Act were applicable, thereby making the entire transaction taxable.
7. Legality of Charging Interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C:
The assessee contested the mechanical charging of interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C as illegal. The ITAT held that the charging of interest was consequential and in accordance with law.
8. Assessment Year for Capital Gains:
The assessee argued that all capital gains were wrongly assessed in the AY 2007-08. The ITAT upheld the assessment, stating that the capital gains were correctly assessed in the year of transfer as per the provisions of the IT Act.
9. Rebate u/s 54F:
The assessee claimed that no rebate u/s 54F was given. The ITAT rejected this claim, noting that the assessee did not fulfill the conditions required for such rebate.
10. Validity of Proceedings u/s 148:
In ITA No. 406(Asr)/2013, the assessee argued that proceedings u/s 148 were wrongly initiated. The ITAT upheld the validity of the proceedings, finding no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A).
Conclusion:
The ITAT Amritsar dismissed all the appeals, upholding the assessments and the legal positions taken by the revenue authorities in line with the prevailing legal interpretations and precedents.
9911796707
Advanced Search 
