Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2020 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (8) TMI 894 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Request for waiver of interest, penalty, and non-production of 'C' forms.
2. Non-consideration of petitioner's request leading to filing of writ petitions.
3. Pending departmental request for waiver of penalty and interest.
4. Refusal to recommend waiver of amount for non-submission of 'C' forms.
5. Interpretation of BIFR order and justification for waiver.
6. Setting aside of impugned notice and granting liberty for representation.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a sick industrial company, sought a waiver of interest, penalty, and non-production of 'C' forms based on a revival scheme sanctioned by the BIFR. The department's non-consideration of the request prompted the filing of writ petitions.
2. While the department had requested the Waiver Committee for remission of penalty and interest, the matter was pending as of the last update. The petitioner did not contest the favorable recommendation for waiver of interest and penalty, leaving room to challenge any adverse findings by the Waiver Committee.
3. The dispute arose regarding the refusal to recommend waiver for the amount related to non-submission of 'C' forms. The BIFR order had exempted the company from penalties, interest, and other levies for late payments of sales tax, contradicting the department's stance of lacking proof for loss of records.
4. The judgment emphasized that the department should not defy the BIFR's orders and should consider exempting the company from the amount concerning non-submission of 'C' forms. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Government for representation seeking waiver, aligning with the ends of justice.
5. Consequently, the impugned notice was set aside, allowing the petitioner to represent to the first respondent for waiver of the specified amount. The first respondent was directed to consider the representation in line with the BIFR's orders within 12 weeks. The petitioner retained the right to challenge any adverse findings on penalty and interest recommendations before the Waiver Committee.
6. The Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed, concluding the legal proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates