Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2019 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (6) TMI 1677 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
1. Whether the intervenors/students are necessary parties in the case.
2. Challenge to the legality and validity of an Ordinance amending Section 16 of the SEBC Act, 2018.
3. Interpretation of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding the admission process for the academic year.
4. Maintaining the harmony between different orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
5. Impact of the directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the present petition.

Analysis:
1. The High Court held that the intervenors/students are necessary parties in the case, allowing the applications and joining them as respondents with necessary amendments to the cause title. This decision was made to ensure all relevant parties are included in the proceedings.

2. The petition challenged the legality and validity of an Ordinance that amended Section 16 of the SEBC Act, 2018. The petitioners approached the High Court after being granted liberty by the Hon'ble Apex Court. The timeline of events following the Ordinance issuance and subsequent directions from the Supreme Court was detailed in the judgment.

3. The High Court considered the interpretation of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding the admission process for the academic year. It was noted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had already given clear directions regarding the admission process, and further interpretation by the High Court was deemed unnecessary.

4. Emphasizing the need for maintaining harmony between different orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the High Court declined to entertain the petition, as the Supreme Court had already provided a clear interpretation of its earlier order. The arguments presented by both sides were considered, leading to the dismissal of the petition as not maintainable.

5. The impact of the directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the present petition, especially regarding the admission process for the academic year, was a crucial factor in the High Court's decision to dismiss the petition. The rejection of the application seeking clarification further reinforced the view that the petition could not be entertained due to its potential impact on the admission process.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the petition as not maintainable before them, considering the clarity of the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the potential impact of the petition on the admission process for the academic year. The detailed analysis encompassed various legal arguments and interpretations, ultimately leading to the decision to dismiss the petition.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates