Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2019 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (2) TMI 2042 - HC - Income Tax


Issues involved:
1. Tax liability on interest paid along with compensation by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
2. Applicability of TDS on interest above Rs. 50,000.
3. Conflict between judgments of different courts regarding TDS on interest awarded on compensation.

Analysis:
1. The judgment discusses the tax liability on interest paid along with compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. It references a case where it was held that no tax is payable on interest up to Rs. 50,000, and beyond that, tax is to be deducted at source on the aggregate amount of such income paid during the financial year.

2. Another set of cases, including one titled New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Savitri Devi, held that interest paid along with compensation is not liable for TDS. The judgment emphasized the unjustness of asking victims to pay tax on interest received due to delayed payment, for which they are not responsible. The Tribunal's orders directing that compensation or interest cannot be subjected to TDS were upheld.

3. The matter was also brought before the Bombay High Court, which referred the issue to the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The CBDT opined that tax on interest awarded on compensation would be deductible at source. Additionally, it was highlighted that if the interest on the compensation amount exceeds Rs. 50,000, tax would still be deductible at source as per Section 194-A (3) (ixa) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

4. In light of the conflicting judgments and opinions, the court issued a notice to the claimant before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for further proceedings. The operation of the impugned order directing the petitioner company to deposit the TDS amount was stayed until the next date of hearing, ensuring no immediate financial burden on the company.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates