Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2021 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (7) TMI 1400 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
- Re-opening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Non-receipt of assessment order and appeal under Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act)
- Service of notice under Section 282 of the Income Tax Act

Analysis:

Re-opening of assessment under Section 148:
The Petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13, declaring total income. Respondent No.4 re-opened the assessment for the said year in March 2019. The Petitioner claimed not to have received the Assessment Order under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the I.T. Act, which hindered the ability to respond to the show cause notice.

Non-receipt of assessment order and appeal under DTVSV Act:
The Petitioner repeatedly requested the assessment order from Respondent No.4 to avail the benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act). Despite the Petitioner's efforts, the assessment order was received only in December 2020, after the deadline to file an appeal had passed. The rejection of the Petitioner's application under the DTVSV Act was based on the failure to file an appeal by the specified date.

Service of notice under Section 282 of the Income Tax Act:
The Court highlighted the importance of serving notices as per Section 282 of the I.T. Act, which outlines various methods of communication. It was noted that the assessment order had not been served on the Petitioner until December 2020, causing a delay in the ability to file an appeal. The Court emphasized that the purpose of the DTVSV Act is to resolve disputed tax matters and put an end to litigation.

In conclusion, the Court allowed the Petition, setting aside the order rejecting the Petitioner's application under the DTVSV Act. The Respondents were directed to consider the Petitioner's application and issue the proper order in accordance with the provisions of the Act within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the importance of timely service of notices and the need to facilitate the resolution of disputed tax matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates