Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2021 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 1292 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues: Bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C for offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 & 34 of the IPC.

Analysis:

1. Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C:
- The applicant filed a bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C seeking bail in connection with a case registered for offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 & 34 of the IPC at a police station in Indore.
- The complainant alleged that the applicant, along with co-accused, operated investment companies and induced investments with promises of high returns. The complainant deposited a significant amount but did not receive the assured returns, leading to accusations of cheating and forgery.

2. Arguments by Applicant's Counsel:
- The applicant's counsel argued that the co-accused had already been granted bail by the Court. The firms were registered entities, and the complainant himself deposited funds willingly, aware of the risks involved. The investigation was complete, and further custodial interrogation was unnecessary, as the charge sheet had been filed.

3. Opposition by State and Complainant:
- The State's lawyer and complainant's counsel opposed the bail application, alleging that the applicant had defrauded not only the complainant but many other residents. They contended that the promised returns were not provided, indicating a lack of entitlement to bail.

4. Court's Consideration and Decision:
- The Court noted that the complainant, an educated individual, invested willingly after understanding the company's scheme, implying awareness of potential risks. The investigation was complete, and the trial was expected to be lengthy. The main accused was already in custody, and the applicant had parity with co-accused who were granted bail.
- Without delving into the case's merits, the Court allowed the bail application, directing the applicant's release on furnishing a personal bond and surety. The applicant was required to appear before the trial Court, abide by specified conditions, and undergo a medical examination for COVID-19 before release.

5. Final Order:
- The Court granted bail to the applicant, emphasizing the need for compliance with bail conditions and court appearances. Additionally, the jail authorities were instructed to conduct a medical examination for COVID-19 before the applicant's release.

This detailed analysis encapsulates the key aspects of the judgment, addressing the bail application, arguments presented by both sides, the Court's considerations, and the final decision granting bail to the applicant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates