2007 (2) TMI 215 - HC - Income Tax

Assessee, charitable trust filed application for accumulation of income revenue allege that assessee not mentioned the specific purpose for accumulation, but only mentioned that it would be utilized for the objects of the trust - held that it is not necessary to state specifically that for which purpose the accumulation is sought assessee cannot be denied to exemption u/s 11(2) if assessee could not utilize the amount due to statutory regulation

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 11(2) of the Income-tax Act regarding accumulation of funds by a charitable organization.
2. Compliance with the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 for utilization of accumulated funds.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Interpretation of section 11(2) of the Income-tax Act regarding accumulation of funds by a charitable organization:
The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against an order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal concerning the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99. The appellant, a charitable organization registered under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, sought permission to accumulate funds in accordance with section 11(2) of the Act. The Assessing Officer raised concerns regarding the specificity of the purpose for accumulation and the investment of the accumulated amount as required by section 11(5) of the Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) sided with the Assessing Officer, but the Tribunal reversed the decision. The High Court referenced a previous case to emphasize that the purpose for accumulation need not be specifically stated as long as it aligns with the objects of the trust. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration.

Issue 2: Compliance with the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 for utilization of accumulated funds:
The second issue pertained to the actual utilization of the accumulated funds by the charitable organization. The Tribunal noted that due to an order under section 12 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976, the bank was prohibited from dealing with the deposited amount, preventing the organization from receiving income. The High Court acknowledged that even if the organization had received income, the prohibitory order under the Foreign Contribution Act hindered its utilization for the intended purpose. The court supported the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the organization could not be expected to violate the law by utilizing the funds against a prohibitory order. Consequently, the court found no error in the Tribunal's view, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision on both issues, emphasizing the alignment of the purpose for accumulation with the trust's objects and the legal constraints preventing the utilization of funds due to the Foreign Contribution Act. The court found no substantial question of law warranting further consideration and dismissed the appeal by the Revenue.