2022 (10) TMI 1226 - HC - Companies Law

Striking out the name of the company - HELD THAT - The issue is covered by the decision in the case of LEKA CONSULTING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CUTTACK AND ANOTHER 2021 (12) TMI 1484 - ORISSA HIGH COURT where it was held that Petitioner might approach the Tribunal to contend that impugned order be amended on the Tribunal not having allowed his client to adduce evidence of the company being in operation, in context of the report having said that his client may be put to strict proof. If the Tribunal is satisfied, it may amend impugned order. Application disposed off.

Summary

The Orissa High Court, in a judgment by Justice Arindam Sinha, disposed of a writ petition covered by an earlier order dated 23rd December, 2021. The petitioner's advocate pointed out similarities with a previous case involving the Registrar of Companies (ROC) requiring strict proof of the company's operation at the time of striking out. The Court found the current petition aligned with the previous order and resolved it accordingly.